Legal Opinion

United States v. City of Baltimore

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided February 29, 2012No. Civil Nos. JFM-09-1049, JFM-09-1766PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

J. FREDERICK MOTZ, District Judge.

Plaintiffs, the United States (“Department of Justice” or “DOJ”) and the Baltimore City Substance Abuse Directorate (“BCSAD”), bring related actions against Defendant, City of Baltimore (“the City”). In both cases it is alleged' that the City of Baltimore Zoning Code discriminates against individuals receiving treatment in residential substance abuse treatment programs (“RSATPs”) in violation of Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12131 et seq., and the Fair Housing Act (“FHA”), as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Bragdon v. AbbottSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Secretary Florida Agency for Health Care AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
  2. A.R. ex rel. Root v. DudekDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2014
  3. Affinity Recovery Center LLC v. Town Commissioners of SudlersvilleDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API