Legal Opinion

Reagan v. Heintz

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided July 30, 1968PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

O’HORA, Judge.

Petitioners herein seek to have a decision of the Board of Adjustment of the City of Rehoboth Beach (hereinafter referred to as the “Board”) reversed.

Petitioners, husband and wife, purchased the property in question in 1966. At the time the property contained improvements consisting of a cottage, constructed on a poured concrete foundation incasing water and plumbing pipes, a railroad pullman car, and a screened porch connecting the cottage and railroad car. These improvements were located to the rear of the property and, running in a straight line, were eighteen inches…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Searles v. DarlingSupreme Court of Delaware · 1951
  2. In Re the Application of Emmett S. Hickman Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1954
  3. Homan v. LynchSupreme Court of Delaware · 1959
  4. Zoning Board of Adjustment v. Dragon Run Terrace, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1966
  5. Sutton v. Board of Adjustment of City of WilmingtonSuperior Court of Delaware · 1962

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Baker v. ConnellSupreme Court of Delaware · 1985
  2. Janaman v. New Castle County Board of AdjustmentSuperior Court of Delaware · 1976
  3. Board of Adjustment v. Kwik-Check Realty, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API