Legal Opinion

United States v. Alhaggagi

District Court, N.D. California

Decided March 8, 2019No. Case No. 17-cr-00387-CRB-1Published

1Opinion of the Court

Because Defendant's offense satisfies both parts of 18 U.S.C. § 2332b(g)(5), the offense involves a "federal crime of terrorism," and the terrorism enhancement applies. See U.S.S.G. § 3A1.4(a) (2018).

B. Enhancement's Treatment of Criminal History

Nevertheless, as the Court held at sentencing, the enhancement's treatment of criminal history-automatically assigning to all terrorism defendants a criminal history category of VI-is inappropriate based on the seriousness of the crime, inappropriate based on assumptions about recidivism, and inappropriate as to this Defendant, warranting a downward…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Kimbrough v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Nichols v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. United States v. CantrellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API