United States v. Alhaggagi
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
Because Defendant's offense satisfies both parts of 18 U.S.C. § 2332b(g)(5), the offense involves a "federal crime of terrorism," and the terrorism enhancement applies. See U.S.S.G. § 3A1.4(a) (2018).
B. Enhancement's Treatment of Criminal History
Nevertheless, as the Court held at sentencing, the enhancement's treatment of criminal history-automatically assigning to all terrorism defendants a criminal history category of VI-is inappropriate based on the seriousness of the crime, inappropriate based on assumptions about recidivism, and inappropriate as to this Defendant, warranting a downward…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Kimbrough v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Nichols v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. CantrellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.