Legal Opinion

In re the Detention of Mulkins

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 9, 2010No. 63222-1-IPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGrosse, J.

¶1 A respondent in a sexually violent predator (SVP) proceeding is not entitled to present evidence that he or she may be eligible to participate in the Community Protection Program (CPP) unless the evidence establishes that this option would in fact exist for the respondent as a placement condition or voluntary treat*402ment option upon an unconditional release. Here, the respondent failed to show that he was actually accepted into and agreed to participate in the program upon his release; he simply presented a letter indicating that he was a potential candidate for the program. Consequently, he…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Matter of Personal Restraint of YoungWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. CarverWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  3. In re the Detention of BrooksWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  5. State v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Detention of Jason MunsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API