Legal Opinion
Lehr v. Tapestry, Inc.
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Decided May 2, 2025No. 3:23-cv-00675Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION SARAH LEHR, ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 3: 23-cv-00675 ) Judge Trauger /Frensley TAPESTRY, INC., ) Defendant. ) REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION This removed, pro se employment action is before the Court on defendant Tapestry, Inc.’s (“Tapestry”) motion for summary judgment. Docket No. 22. Plaintiff opposes the motion and defendant has replied. After reviewing the record and the briefs, the undersigned recommends that defendant’s motion be granted, and the action be dismissed in its entirety. I. BACKGROUND…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Jeffrey Moldowan v. Maureen FournierCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.