Legal Opinion

Ragan v. County of Alamance

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 5, 1990No. 8915SC974Published

1Opinion of the Court

DUNCAN, Judge.

Plaintiffs seek a writ of mandamus ordering defendants to make certain improvements to the Alamance County Courthouse. Defendants appealed after the trial judge denied their motion to dismiss this action. Because we hold that mandamus may not issue in this case, we vacate and remand with instructions that the judge enter an order dismissing the Complaint.

I

Plaintiffs, representing a class of people similarly situated, allege that the Courthouse in Alamance County is, in multiple respects, inadequate. Plaintiffs Eunice Ragan and Terry Wall are paraplegics who rely upon wheelchair…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Koontz v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. Stillwell Enterprises, Inc. v. Interstate Equipment Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Orange County v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  4. Zimmer v. North Carolina Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  5. Moffitt v. . AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API