Zimmer v. North Carolina Department of Transportation
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Judge.
Relying upon the doctrine of sovereign immunity, DOT contends that the Industrial Commission has no jurisdiction over the person of the State in this case and that its motion to dismiss pursuant to G.S. 1A-1, Rule 12(b)(2) should have been granted. On the other hand, claimant contends that no real issue of personal jurisdiction exists and that the order denying DOT’s motion is interlocutory and not presently appealable. While we sustain DOT’s right to pursue this appeal, we nevertheless affirm the denial of its motion to dismiss the claim for lack of personal jurisdiction.
Whether…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Guthrie v. North Carolina State Ports AuthoritySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- Teachy v. Coble Dairies, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Great American Insurance Company v. GoldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- Vaughn v. North Carolina Department of Human ResourcesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Sides v. Cabarrus Memorial Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Data General Corp. v. County of DurhamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- Green Ex Rel. Crudup v. KearneyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- Woolard v. North Carolina Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
- M Series Rebuild, LLC v. Town of Mount PleasantCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
- Locus v. Fayetteville State UniversityCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.