Legal Opinion

The United States of America for the Use of Magna Masonry, Inc. v. R.T. Woodfield, Inc., and Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided May 4, 1983No. 82-1332PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DONALD RUSSELL, Circuit Judge:

Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, defendant below, appeals from a judgment in favor of Magna Masonry under the Miller Act, 40 U.S.C. § 270a-f, on the ground that the suit was not filed within the applicable one year limitations period. 40 U.S.C. § 270b(b). Use plaintiff Magna Masonry was the masonry subcontractor of R.T. Woodfield, Inc. on a federal construction project of which Woodfield was the general contractor. Under the Labor and Material Payment Bond required by the Miller Act, 40 U.S.C. § 270a(a)(2), Fidelity was Woodfield’s surety. Magna began…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States ex rel. Austin v. Western Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  2. United States Ex Rel. Altman v. Young Lumber CompanyDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1974
  3. United States ex rel. Noland Co. v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1969

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Wickes Manufacturing Co. v. Currier Electric Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1991
  2. Bailey v. FauxDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1989
  3. In Re Vincent J. Fasano, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. New York · 1985
  4. United States Ex Rel. Hussmann Corp. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
  5. United States of America, for the Use and Benefit of Interstate Mechanical Contractors, Inc. v. International Fidelity Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API