Legal Opinion
Rogers v. Allied Mutual Insurance Co.
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided August 24, 1994No. 18594PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WUEST, Justice.
Doug and LeEtta Rogers appeal the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Allied Mutual Insurance Company (Allied). We affirm.
FACTS
Doug and LeEtta Rogers are husband and wife. (Hereinafter in this opinion they shall be referred to collectively as “Rogers,” and individually as “Doug” and “LeEtta.”) The Rogers were formerly residents of Aberdeen, South Dakota although they now reside in the state of Washington. On November 7, 1985, LeEtta was driving the Rogers’ vehicle, which was insured by Allied. Another driver, Ed Koth (Koth) was driving his vehicle which was…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Wilson v. Great Northern Railway CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
- Permann v. South Dakota Department of Labor, Unemployment Insurance DivisionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Taggart v. Ford Motor Credit Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- Cano v. Travelers Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1983
- Enchanted World Doll Museum v. BuskohlSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Alverson v. Northwestern National Casualty Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Mid-Century Insurance Co. v. LyonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Olson v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Gloe v. Union Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Opperman v. Heritage Mutual Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.