Legal Opinion
Commercial Finance Corp. v. Burke
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided December 21, 1943PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBailey, C. J.
This suit was instituted by. Commercial Finance Corporation to foreclose a chattel mortgage on a 19.40 Chevrolet automobile owned by Frederick G. Markwardt and T. E. Markwardt; co-partners doing, business.as Chiloquin Garage & Auto Company, who will hereinafter be referred to as the defendants. A. L. Mallory, who had the automobile in his possession at the time the suit was instituted, was made a party- defendant, and filed .a joint answer .with.the Markwardts.' W. J. Burke also was named as a defendaht but was not served and made no appearance.
The facts in the case are not in dispute. In…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- National Safe Deposit, Sav. & Trust Co. of DC v. HibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Knox v. Eden Musee Americain Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Russell v. American Bell Telephone Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
- Scollans v. RollinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
- Schumann v. Bank of California, N. A.Oregon Supreme Court · 1925
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Poesy v. BunneyIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
- Plummer v. KingsleyOregon Supreme Court · 1951
- Mori v. Chicago National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1954
- Ruddy v. Oregon Automobile Credit Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1946
- South Seattle Auto Auction, Inc. v. LaddOregon Supreme Court · 1962
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.