Legal Opinion

Murges v. Bowman

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 30, 1995No. 1-93-4318PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McCORMICK

Defendants John T. Bowman and Lane Allan Corday appeal from a preliminary injunction entered against them in this lawsuit, which arose out of the breakup of the law firm of Murges, Bowman & Cor-day (MBC) (now known as plaintiff, George J. Murges and Associates, Ltd.). We affirm.

Defendants removed client files from MBC’s offices when they quit the firm in December 1991. In February 1992, the trial court imposed a temporary restraining order (TRO), which required defendants to deposit all fees earned on the disputed files into an escrow account. On July 23, 1992, the court appointed a receiver…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Jacob v. Norris, McLaughlin & MarcusSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
  2. O'HARA v. AhlgrenIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Corti v. FleisherAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  4. Veco Corp. v. BabcockAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  5. Kable Printing Co. v. Mount Morris Bookbinders Union Local 65-B Graphic Arts International UnionIllinois Supreme Court · 1976

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Joseph P. Storto, P.C. v. BeckerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  2. JOSEPH P. STORTO, PC v. BeckerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  3. Callis, Papa, Jackstadt & Halloran, P.C. v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Callis, Papa, Jackstadt & Halloran, P.C. v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Callis, Papa, Jackstadt & Halloran, P.C. v. Norfolk & Western Ry. Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API