Callis, Papa, Jackstadt & Halloran, P.C. v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.
Illinois Supreme Court
1DissentChief Justice Harrison
Settlement of Rush’s FELA claim against the railroad rendered this appeal moot. His law firm’s motion to dismiss the appeal should therefore have been allowed. I so voted when the motion was first presented to this court, and I continue to adhere to that view.
Even if the merits of the appeal were properly before us, I could not join in the majority’s opinion. Contrary to my colleagues, I believe that Callis, Papa, Jensen, Jackstadt & Halloran, P.C. v. Norfolk Southern Corp., 292 Ill. App. 3d 1003 (1997) .(Callis I) was correctly decided. Under Callis I, the preliminary injunction issued by…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. YapejianIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
- Desnick v. Department of Professional RegulationIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
- Benson v. IsaacsIllinois Supreme Court · 1961
- Postma v. Jack Brown Buick, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1993
- Material Service Corp. v. HollingsworthIllinois Supreme Court · 1953
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.