Legal Opinion
Martin v. City & County of San Francisco
California Supreme Court
Decided February 15, 1901No. S.F. No. 2243PublishedCited by 3 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. S. W. & E. B. Holladay, D. P. Belknap, and L. D. McKisick, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Appeal from the judgment of the superior court' in favor of the defendant, and dismissing the action.
The action involves the title to a tract of land in San Francisco held by the defendant for public purposes. The complaint was filed in 1872, and the answer thereto was filed in 1873. In December, 1875, upon the petition of the plaintiff, the cause was removed to the United States circuit court, and in October, 1887, was remanded to the superior court of the city and county of San Francisco. Ho further steps therein were taken by either party to the action until June 28, 1899, when a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Stone v. JefferdsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Nicol v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
3Cited by3 opinions
- Romero v. SnyderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Barry v. LearnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Grass v. Rindge Co.California Court of Appeal · 1927