United States v. Moran Towing & Transportation Company, Incorporated, United States of America v. Bethlehem Steel Company
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge:
In United States v. Bethlehem Steel Co. et al., 389 U.S. 575, 88 S.Ct. 689, 19 L.Ed.2d 775, the Supreme Court vacated our decision1 and remanded the case to us for further consideration in the light of Wyandotte Transportation Co. v. United States, 389 U.S. 191, 88 S.Ct. 379, 19 L.Ed.2d 407. After supplemental briefing and argument, we reach the conclusion that further proceedings in the District Court are necessary, and the case will be remanded for that purpose.
In calm seas and clear weather the lead section of a wooden dry dock under tow began to list. The leak…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wyandotte Transportation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. Moran Towing & Transportation Company, Incorporated, United States of America v. Bethlehem Steel CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
- United States v. Bethlehem Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. Bethlehem Steel CompanyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1964
3Cited by15 opinions
- Willard H. Lane v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1975
- Chinese Maritime Trust, Ltd. v. Panama Canal CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Ohio Barge Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Chesapeake & Delaware Shipyard, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1974
- Vandergrift v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1978
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.