Legal Opinion

In the Matter of Rufus Cook, No. D-217

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided January 30, 1995No. 263PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Attorney Disciplinary Proceeding.

EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge.

Rufus Cook, a member of this court’s bar, represented the plaintiff class in a Iong-run-ning action against the City of Chicago. After losing a number of preliminary skirmishes, see Alexander v. Chicago Park District, 709 F.2d 463 (7th Cir.1983), Alexander v. Chicago Park District, 773 F.2d 850 (1985), Cook entered into a settlement on behalf of one subclass, with 19 members, and abandoned efforts to obtain relief for the remaining plaintiffs. Chicago agreed to pay $500,000, a sum that included all costs and attorneys’ fees, in…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Stoll v. GottliebSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. United States v. RylanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Theard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. In Re CookCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  2. In Re Dennis E. CARLSON, Debtor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
  3. Wade v. Soo Line RR Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
  4. Gita Sports Ltd. v. SG Sensortechnik GmbH & Co. KGDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2008
  5. People v. NanceIllinois Supreme Court · 2000

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API