Legal Opinion · Dissent

Dow Chemical Co. v. Curtis

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 17, 1988No. 80516, (Calendar No. 8)Published

1DissentCavanagh, J.

We are asked to de*491termine the extent to which an amendment of the labor dispute disqualification provision of the Michigan Employment Security Act1 contained in 1974 PA 104 applies to the 486 claims at issue in this appeal. Implicit in the majority opinion is the conclusion that the amendment is substantive and ought to be applied prospectively. I write separately to express my disagreement with the majority’s conclusion that the claimants’ eligibility may be redetermined for benefit weeks subsequent to the effective date of the amendment.

i

During a labor dispute with Dow Chemical Company, 486…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Franks v. White Pine Copper DivisionMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Lawrence Baking Co. v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Deziel v. Difco Laboratories, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Hurd v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1985
  5. General Motors Corp. v. ErvesMichigan Supreme Court · 1976

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API