Legal Opinion

Gill v. Backus

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 1896PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Alcona; Simpson, J. Debt by George A. Gill against Absalom Backus, Jr., Joseph Van Buskirk, and Bernard P. Cowley, upon a bond given for the release of property attached under the log-lien law. From a judgment for plaintiff on verdict directed by the court, defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

Gill brought an action in circuit court by attachment, under the log-lien law, against Morrill & Morrill, copartners, claiming a lien for $135 upon certain lumber. Backus intervened as owner of the lumber, and *418gave a bond for the release thereof. The trial resulted in a verdict in favor of Gill for 1105.64 damages, $52.50 thereof being found to be a lien upon the lumber. Judgment was rendered upon the verdict, for the. damages aforesaid, and concluded as follows:

“And it is further considered, ordered, and adjudged that the said plaintiff do have a lien upon the property-described in his…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People ex rel. Clinton v. RiceMichigan Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Syndicate Improvement Co. v. BradleyWyoming Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Kent Probate Judge Ex Rel. Heaney v. American Employers Ins.Michigan Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Dudley v. ConelyMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Miller v. MaherMichigan Supreme Court · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API