Legal Opinion
Hillard v. Medtronic, Inc.
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 21, 1995No. Civil 95-546PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
NEALON, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, Ronald L. Hillard (Hillard), Richard W. Conklin (Conklin), Intermedies, Inc., and CarboMedies, Inc. initiated this declaratory judgment action on April 7, 1995, against defendant Medtronic, Inc. (Medtronic). Plaintiffs Hillard and Conklin are former employees of Medtronic and seek a judgment declaring that restrictive covenants signed by them, while employed by Medtronic, are now unenforceable. On May 9, 1995, Medtronic filed an answer and counterclaim against all four plaintiffs. In the counterclaim, which alleges breach of contract and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Campbell Soup Company v. Conagra, Inc. Sallie W. Rosenthal Conagra, Inc. And Sallie RosenthalCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- John G. Bryant Co. v. Sling Testing & Repair, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Hohe v. CaseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Losch v. Borough Of ParkesburgCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Wellspan Health v. BaylissSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Laidlaw, Inc. v. Student Transportation of America, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- Innoviant Pharmacy, Inc. v. MorgansternDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2005
- Sunny Isle Shopping Center, Inc. v. Xtra Super Food Centers, Inc.District Court, Virgin Islands · 2002
- Viad Corp. v. CordialDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.