Legal Opinion

State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Harbert

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 2007No. 24366PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TUCKER, Circuit Judge.

[¶ 1.] State Farm Fire & Casualty (State Farm) brought this declaratory judgment action to determine if coverage or a duty to defend existed in an underlying action. In that case David Kalt (Kalt) brought suit against Thomas Harbert (Harbert) for alienation of the affections of his former spouse, Peggy Kalt (Peggy). Harbert sought personal liability coverage on the underlying action from State Farm under his personal liability umbrella policy. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of State Farm, finding no coverage and, thereby, no duty to defend. Harbert…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Great Northern Railway CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Pickering v. PickeringSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Ambassador Insurance Company v. MontesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
  4. Veeder v. KennedySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  5. City of Fort Pierre v. United Fire & Casualty Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1990

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Schleuter v. Northern Plains Ins. Co., Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Swenson v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Demaray v. De Smet Farm Mutual Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Owners Insurance Co. v. Tibke Construction, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Swenson v. Owners Ins. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2013

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API