People v. Sekona
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TURNER, P. J.
I. Introduction
Defendant, Vaimoe Sekona, appeals from his convictions of mayhem (Pen. Code, § 203) 1 and assault with great bodily injury and with a deadly weapon (§ 245, subd. (a)(1)); plus findings he used a deadly weapon (§ 12022, subd. (b)) and had previously been convicted of a serious felony. (§ 667, subd. (a).) Defendant contends the trial court committed reversible error in failing to instruct sua sponte that an honest but unreasonable belief in the need for self-defense negated the malice required for a mayhem conviction. We disagree and affirm the judgment.
II.…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- People v. DillonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- People v. SedenoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- People v. FlannelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- People v. WickershamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- People v. WellsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- People v. MichaelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- People v. AtkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- People v. SZADZIEWICZCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- People v. VillegasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- People v. QuinteroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.