Legal Opinion

People v. Sekona

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 3, 1994No. B077329PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TURNER, P. J.

I. Introduction

Defendant, Vaimoe Sekona, appeals from his convictions of mayhem (Pen. Code, § 203) 1 and assault with great bodily injury and with a deadly weapon (§ 245, subd. (a)(1)); plus findings he used a deadly weapon (§ 12022, subd. (b)) and had previously been convicted of a serious felony. (§ 667, subd. (a).) Defendant contends the trial court committed reversible error in failing to instruct sua sponte that an honest but unreasonable belief in the need for self-defense negated the malice required for a mayhem conviction. We disagree and affirm the judgment.

II.…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. People v. DillonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  2. People v. SedenoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. People v. FlannelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. People v. WickershamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. People v. WellsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. People v. MichaelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  2. People v. AtkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  3. People v. SZADZIEWICZCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  4. People v. VillegasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  5. People v. QuinteroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API