Legal Opinion

Gordon v. Donovan

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 5, 1930PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHinmaist, J.

Assignments of error seven and eight question the right to decree foreclosure predicated upon interest payments due without foreclosure, also, of the principal of the note; assignment six questions the right to include in the judgment interest payments accruing after the date of the original complaint; assignments two, three and four were intended to question the right to render judgment in favor of both of the plaintiffs.

As to the first question, the right to foreclose for overdue interest, where the principal is not yet due, is generally recognized. Butler v. Blackman, 45 Conn. 159; Boyer…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Beach v. IsacsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
  2. Boyer v. ChandlerIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Woodbridge v. Pratt & Whitney Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1897
  4. Duessels. v. Prochs.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1905
  5. Coman v. PetersWashington Supreme Court · 1909

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Daniels v. Elks Club of Hartford and the Human Rights CommissionSupreme Court of Vermont · 2012
  2. Hartford-Connecticut Trust Co. v. Putnam PhalanxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
  3. 669 Atlantic St. v. Atlantic-Rockland, No. Cv90 0110249 S (Apr. 11, 1995)Connecticut Superior Court · 1995
  4. Betzes v. HorowitzConnecticut Superior Court · 1935
  5. Daniels v. Elks Club of Hartford and the Human Rights CommissionSupreme Court of Vermont · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API