Legal Opinion

Metropolitan District v. Housing Authority

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided September 22, 1987No. 5394PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHull, J.

The petitioner in this action is a municipal corporation authorized, inter alia, to deliver water and sewer services to the residents of the Metropolitan District, which includes the city of Hartford. The respondent is a public housing authority which owns low and moderate income housing projects in the city of Hartford. The petitioner has, for a number of years, provided sewer services to the respondent’s housing projects.

On January 16, 1986, the petitioner filed a petition in the Superior Court for the appointment of a receiver of rents.1 The petitioner asserted that from January 1,…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  2. Dunham v. DunhamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  3. State v. SharpeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  4. Johnson v. FlammiaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
  5. State v. TaltonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Lester v. Resort Camplands International, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1992
  2. Borkowski v. SachetiConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  3. Jacques All Trades Corp. v. BrownConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  4. State v. SmithConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  5. Citicorp Mortgage, Inc. v. TarroConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API