Legal Opinion

Taylor v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 6, 1991No. 10-90-181-CRPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CUMMINGS, Justice.

Daniel Ray Taylor appeals his conviction for burglary of a habitation. Taylor was found guilty by a jury, and, as a result of two prior convictions which enhanced the range of punishment, the jury assessed his punishment at forty-years confinement in prison and a $1,500 fine.

In his first and second points of error, Taylor contends that the trial court erred in admitting his confession into evidence because it was not voluntarily given and because of a lack of probable cause for the initial stop and arrest. Although Taylor objected to the admission of the confession at…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. DeGarmo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  2. Mulder v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  3. Motley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  4. Daugereau v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
  5. Ellis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Phelps v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)1999
  2. Cantu v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1999
  3. Cesar Carmona Mojica Sr. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2009
  4. Cesar Carmona Mojica Sr. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2009
  5. John Cantu v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API