Motley v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
McCORMICK, Presiding Judge.
Appellant was convicted of the offense of capital murder. Punishment was assessed at death.
In point of error number one appellant asks us to consider whether his right to a fair trial was abrogated by the prosecutor stating to jurors without objection from defense counsel that there is no difference between deliberate conduct and intentional conduct. In his second point of error, appellant argues that the State’s burden of proof was lessened in violation of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution when the prosecutor was allowed to qualify jurors…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Woodson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Jurek v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Lowenfield v. PhelpsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Felder v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Riddle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Robert Anthony Carter v. Gary L. Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
- Motley v. CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.