Mulder v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
W.C. DAVIS, Judge.
Appellants were charged in separate indictments and tried jointly for attempted capital murder. The jury found that the enhancement paragraphs alleged against each appellant were true. Punishment for each appellant was assessed at life imprisonment. See V.T.C.A., Penal Code, Sec. 12.42(d).
Both appellants raise numerous grounds of error, including challenges to the sufficiency of the evidence. We turn first to the sufficiency claims. Each indictment charged that each appellant,
did then and there intentionally and knowingly, with specific intent to commit the offense of…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. EdwardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hankins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
- McManus v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Marini v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by111 opinions
- Marquez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Montoya v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Tucker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Henson, Kevin RayCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2013
- Rougeau v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
106 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.