Legal Opinion

Mulder v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 9, 1986No. 68789, 68790PublishedCited by 111 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

W.C. DAVIS, Judge.

Appellants were charged in separate indictments and tried jointly for attempted capital murder. The jury found that the enhancement paragraphs alleged against each appellant were true. Punishment for each appellant was assessed at life imprisonment. See V.T.C.A., Penal Code, Sec. 12.42(d).

Both appellants raise numerous grounds of error, including challenges to the sufficiency of the evidence. We turn first to the sufficiency claims. Each indictment charged that each appellant,

did then and there intentionally and knowingly, with specific intent to commit the offense of…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. United States v. EdwardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Hankins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
  4. McManus v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  5. Marini v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by111 opinions

  1. Marquez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  2. Montoya v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  3. Tucker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  4. Henson, Kevin RayCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2013
  5. Rougeau v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987

106 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API