Robinoff v. District Court
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Doyle
Petitioners seek review by Writ of Certiorari, or in the alternative, prohibition. They challenge the jurisdiction of the district court of the City and County of Denver to hear condemnation proceedings instituted incident to the so-called Urban Renewal Program of the City and County of Denver. Numerous preliminary motions were filed by petitioners in the district court, all of which were denied. On the theory that there is no adequate remedy other than the instant writs, they have proceeded on the authority of Swift v. Smith, 119 Colo. 126, 201 P. (2d) 609, and Old Timers Baseball…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Belovsky v. Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Redevelopment Agency v. HayesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Zurn v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1945
- Highland v. Russell Car & Snow Plow Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Miller v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1963
- Denver Urban Renewal Authority v. ByrneSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
- City & County of Denver v. Block 173 AssociatesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- Boise Redevelopment Agency v. Yick Kong Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1972
- Annbar Associates v. West Side Redevelopment Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1965
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.