Legal Opinion

Young v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided February 18, 1928PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlair, J.

This action was commenced in the Circuit Court of Jackson County on July 5, 1922. The original plaintiffs were Albert Young and Frank Titus. To avoid confusion, we will refer to them in this opinion as plaintiffs. In addition to Southwestern Bell Telephone Company and Kansas City Telephone Company, who are respondents in this court, the Home Telephone Company and the Missouri & Kansas Telephone Company were named as defendants below. Respondents Southwestern Bell Telephone Company and Kansas City Telephone Company appeared in the circuit court and filed separate demurrers. No service of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Benton County v. MorganSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901
  2. Somerville v. HellmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Branner v. KlaberSupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
  2. Cacioppo v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Michael Biffle v. Sho-Me Power Electric, etc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
  4. St. Louis Smelting & Refining Co. v. HobanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1948
  5. Barfield v. Sho-Me Power Electric CooperativeDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2014

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API