Somerville v. Hellman
Supreme Court of Missouri
Error to St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. Daniel G. Taylor, Judge. (1) Hattie P. Somerville was under tlie facts pleaded an original surety for her husband’s loan. Higgins v. Harvester Co., 181 Mo. 308; White v. Smith, 174 Mo. 186; Johnson v. Bank, 173 Mo. 171; Propes v. Propes, 171 Mo. 418; McCullum v. Broughton, 132 Mo. 601; Barrett v. Davis, 104 Mo. 549'; Barkhoefer v. Barkhoefer, 93 Mo.
Read the full summary
Error to St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. Daniel G. Taylor, Judge. (1) Hattie P. Somerville was under tlie facts pleaded an original surety for her husband’s loan. Higgins v. Harvester Co., 181 Mo. 308; White v. Smith, 174 Mo. 186; Johnson v. Bank, 173 Mo. 171; Propes v. Propes, 171 Mo. 418; McCullum v. Broughton, 132 Mo. 601; Barrett v. Davis, 104 Mo. 549'; Barkhoefer v. Barkhoefer, 93 Mo. App. 373. (2) Blair’s assumption of the $18,500 deed of trust changed the relation of William Somerville from principal to surety for Blair who became the principal debtor. Or-rick v. Durham, 79 Mo.…
1Opinion of the Court
FOX, P. J. —
This cause is before this court upon
a writ of error sued out by plaintiffs to have a judgment rendered by the circuit court of the city of St. Louis reviewed by this court'.
This cause in a certain sense may be treated as a companion case with Clementine Heilman v. William Somerville et al., decided at the present sitting of this court, and reported in 212 Mo. 415. In that case William and Hattie P. Somerville, who were defendants, filed a cross-bill, which is fully stated in the opinion, and therefore it is unnecessary to reproduce, in the statement of this cause, the cross-bill…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hellman v. SomervilleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
3Cited by5 opinions
- Boynton v. BoyntonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914
- Young v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1928
- Real Estate Investment Co. v. WinnMissouri Court of Appeals · 1938
- Bennett Ex Rel. Bennett v. CraneMissouri Court of Appeals · 1926
- Schloss v. DattiloMissouri Court of Appeals · 1917