Legal Opinion

Lane v. Bradley

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 1, 1959No. Civ. 18324PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDooling, J.

Defendant, James Bradley, appeals by a settled statement from the minute order denying his motion to quash a writ of execution and from the order, included in a memorandum opinion, denying his motion to set aside the minute order.

In May 1946, appellant and respondent entered into a separation agreement. Respondent was granted a Nevada divorce decree in June 1946, the decree referring to the agreement and ordering the parties to fully perform all of its provisions. Thereafter, respondent obtained a judgment in the Superior Court in and for the City and County of San Francisco (by Judge Cronin)…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bradley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Di Corpo v. Di CorpoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Hume v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Foust v. FoustCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Bardwell v. TurnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pinecrest Productions, Inc. v. RKO Teleradio Pictures, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1970
  2. Tobin v. TobinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. Martin v. MartinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API