Lane v. Bradley
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtDooling, J.
Defendant, James Bradley, appeals by a settled statement from the minute order denying his motion to quash a writ of execution and from the order, included in a memorandum opinion, denying his motion to set aside the minute order.
In May 1946, appellant and respondent entered into a separation agreement. Respondent was granted a Nevada divorce decree in June 1946, the decree referring to the agreement and ordering the parties to fully perform all of its provisions. Thereafter, respondent obtained a judgment in the Superior Court in and for the City and County of San Francisco (by Judge Cronin)…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bradley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Di Corpo v. Di CorpoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Hume v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Foust v. FoustCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Bardwell v. TurnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Pinecrest Productions, Inc. v. RKO Teleradio Pictures, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1970
- Tobin v. TobinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Martin v. MartinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970