Legal Opinion

Martin v. Martin

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 20, 1970No. Civ. 33421PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

REPPY, J.

Procedural Background

On October 14, 1964, the Superior Court of Los Angeles County granted a divorce decree between the parties. It provided that defendant-husband (hereinafter, defendant) should pay to plaintiff-wife (hereinafter, plaintiff) as alimony “a sum equal to seventeen and one-half per cent (17 Vi %) of defendant’s gross taxable income from July 1, 1964, through June 30, 1969 ... to be calculated and paid quarterly . . and that defendant “is to make available to plaintiff ... all of his books and records for reasonable inspection, and provide plaintiff with copies of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. See v. SeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Parker v. ParkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Thomasset v. ThomassetCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  4. Weinberg v. WeinbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Fuller v. LindenbaumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wyshak v. WyshakCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  2. In Re Marriage of SandyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API