Legal Opinion

United States v. Fairbanks

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 2, 1938No. 8444PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MATHEWS, Circuit Judge.

The United States (hereafter called plaintiff) brought this action against Douglas Fairbanks (hereafter called defendant) to recover amounts aggregating $72,186.94 claimed to have been erroneously refunded to defendant on account of alleged over-payments of income taxes for 1927, 1928, and 1929, with 6 per cent, interest from the date of refund, January 26, 1932. The case was tried by the court without a jury, trial by jury having been expressly waived. The court made and filed special findings of fact and thereupon entered judgment in favor of plaintiff for the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Burnet v. HarmelSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. United States v. WurtsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Watson v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1932
  4. Alexander v. KingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
  5. Braun v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Bingham v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
  2. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. J. I. Morgan and Frances MorganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
  3. Rogers v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
  4. Ray v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1952
  5. Harold Wener v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Molly Wener v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API