Legal Opinion
Procter & Gamble Co. v. Quality King Distributors, Inc.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided December 4, 2000No. CV95-3113 (ADS)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER
SPATT, District Judge.
This action arises from the claims of the plaintiff-counterclaim defendant, Proctor & Gamble Company (“P & G”), against numerous parties, including Quality King Distributors, Inc. (“Quality King”) and Omnisource International, Inc. (“Omni”), and Neal Rose (“Rose”), whom it alleges were mixing, bottling, selling and distributing potentially harmful, counterfeit Head & Shoulders shampoo, in violation of the Lanham Trade-Mark Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1501, et seq. Presently before the Court is a motion by plaintiff-counterclaim defendant, P & G, for…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Carol A. Gallo v. Prudential Residential Services, Limited Partnership, Doing Business as Prudential Relocation ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Hunt v. CromartieSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Polaroid Corporation v. Polarad Electronics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Innovation Ventures, LLC v. Ultimate One Distributing Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2016
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Fendi Adele S.R.L.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
- Abercrombie & Fitch v. Fashion Shops of Kentucky, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2005
- Too, Inc. v. TJX Companies, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2002
- Ramada Franchise Systems, Inc. v. BoychukDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.