Legal Opinion

Chalmers v. Swarttz

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided March 1, 1932No. 4625PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIS, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a decree of the District Court ordering Chalmers, trustee in bankruptcy, to refund a certain sum deposited by the bankrupts for a composition settlement with their creditors.

The bankrupts, David Gitnig and Natban Gitnig, trading as Joseph Gitnig & Sons, offered terms of composition which were accepted by their creditors. After the referee’s recommendation, the District Court confirmed the composition. An objecting creditor appealed, and this court reversed the decree of confirmation, holding that the bankrupts had issued certain false statements,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Morimura, Arai & Co. v. TabackSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Woolen Corporation of America v. GitnigCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1929
  3. Wechsler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1928

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Portage Wholesale Co. Marachowsky v. DevineCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1951
  2. In re McAllester Hosiery Mills, Inc.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API