Legal Opinion

Gioscio v. Lautenschlager

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 26, 1937No. Civ. 5930PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPullen, P. J.

The action out of which this appeal arose was commenced by the filing of a complaint in the ordinary form to quiet title to the property involved. The answer of appellant Hyde denied plaintiff’s allegations of ownership and set up as a special defense that the defendants purchased the property for an adequate and fair consideration and that plaintiff had been guilty of laches in failing to assert his claim to the property within a reasonable time, and further pleaded adverse possession, and that said action was barred by the appropriate sections of the Code of Civil Procedure. Also in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Davis v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  2. Unger v. MooneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Love v. WatkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Blaisdell v. LeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Hakes Investment Co. v. LyonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Wutzke v. Bill Reid Painting Service, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1984
  2. Merry v. GaribaldiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  3. Upson v. Goodland State Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  4. Andre Flowers v. DancyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  5. Mott v. NardoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API