Blaisdell v. Leach
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
The defendant, Bailey K. Leach, borrowed one thousand dollars from the plaintiff July 18, 1891, and, to secure the payment thereof, executed to him a mortgage upon certain lands which appeared by the record to have been conveyed to him by his wife, Mattie A. Leach. This action was brought to foreclose the mortgage against husband and wife, the plaintiff alleging in his complaint that the wife claims some interest in the mortgaged lands, but that her •claim was subject to the lien of his mortgage. Mattie A. Leach filed a separate answer, alleging that she was the sole owner of the lands, and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chapman v. . RoseNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Bartlett v. DrakeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
- Tunison v. ChamblinIllinois Supreme Court · 1878
- Shirt v. OverjohnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1875
- State v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1890
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Peterson v. PetersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Wutzke v. Bill Reid Painting Service, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1984
- Crittenden v. McCloudCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Merry v. GaribaldiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Estate of StephensCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.