Legal Opinion
Jessie L. Redmond v. Phil Kingston, Warden
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided February 14, 2001No. 99-2333PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POSNER, Circuit Judge.
Under the current regime governing federal habeas corpus for state prison inmates, the inmate must show, so far as bears on this case, that the state court which convicted him applied unreasonably a federal doctrine declared by the United States Supreme Court, 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(1); Williams v. Taylor, 529 U.S. 362, 120 S.Ct. 1495, 146 L.Ed.2d 389 (2000); Morgan v. Krenke, 232 F.3d 562 (7th Cir.2000), in this case the doctrine that unreasonably limiting the cross-examination of a prosecution witness infringes the constitutional right of confrontation. E.g., Delaware v.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Olden v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. John David BartlettCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Daniel Makiel v. Kim ButlerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- Randy Boss and Revell Boss v. Guy Pierce and Mark A. PiersonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- Sussman v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Delvin White v. Jane Coplan, Warden, New Hampshire State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- Kittelson v. DretkeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.