Randy Boss and Revell Boss v. Guy Pierce and Mark A. Pierson
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge.
Randy and Revell Boss1 seek writs of habeas corpus overturning their state robbery and murder convictions. They argue that during their trial prosecutors unconstitutionally withheld from them material evidence favorable to their defense, in violation of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963). The district court concluded that this argument did not warrant habeas corpus relief. Because we believe the Bosses" have adequately established the elements of a Brady violation, we reverse.
I. BACKGROUND
A. The Facts
At the Bosses’ joint trial, the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by125 opinions
- McCambridge v. HallCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- People v. LaValleNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
- Toliver v. McCaughtryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- James E. Ward v. Jerry L. SternesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Richard O'HaraCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
120 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.