Legal Opinion

Alfred Anthony Carson v. Sarah Schroeder et al.

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided October 15, 2025No. 2:25-cv-00214Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION ______ ALFRED ANTHONY CARSON, Plaintiff, Case No. 2:25-cv-214 v. Honorable Maarten Vermaat SARAH SCHROEDER et al., Defendants. ____________________________/ OPINION This is a civil rights action brought by a state prisoner under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. In a separate order, the Court granted Plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff consented to proceed in all matters in this action under the jurisdiction of a United States…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API