Legal Opinion

Brasher v. City of Birmingham

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 30, 1976PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The question before us in this case is whether failure to file a claim with the City Clerk of Birmingham, as required by Tit. 62, § 659, Code, under any set of circumstances, is fatal to the pursuit of negligence actions against the City. We hold it is not and reverse summary judgments in favor of the City.

Plaintiffs, the Brashers, filed suits against the City of Birmingham for damages on account of injuries allegedly received by Mrs. Brasher in a fall on a City sidewalk on 26 December 1974. In spite of the clear language of the statute, the lawyer filed notices of the claims against the City…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ray v. Midfield Park, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1975
  2. City of Montgomery v. WeldonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1967
  3. Ray v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
  4. Allbritton v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
  5. Ray v. Midfield Park, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1972

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Crandall v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  2. Kohen v. BD. OF SCH. COM'RS OF MOBILE CTY.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  3. Evans v. Arizona Dept. of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  4. Fortenberry v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  5. Fuller v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API