Legal Opinion

Fortenberry v. City of Birmingham

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 14, 1990No. 89-830PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Paul R. Fortenberry was injured while employed with the City of Birmingham ("the City"). He later sued the City, and other parties, seeking to recover damages for his injuries. Fortenberry's wife, Sharon, joined the suit, seeking to recover damages for loss of consortium. The trial court entered a summary judgment for the City on the ground that the Fortenberrys had failed to comply with the notice-of-claim requirements of Ala. Code 1975, §§ 11-47-23 and 11-47-192.1 That judgment was made final pursuant to Rule 54(b), A.R.Civ.P., and the Fortenberrys appealed.

After carefully reviewing the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Large v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Crandall v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  3. Brasher v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Davis v. Fayette County CommissionCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2002
  2. Simpson v. Covington County Sheriff's DepartmentSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  3. Yannella v. City of DothanDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API