Legal Opinion
Gem City Metal Spinning v. Dayton Bd., 22083 (1-18-2008)
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided January 18, 2008No. 22083PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} Gem City Metal Spinning Company ("Gem City") appeals from the judgment of the Common Pleas Court of Montgomery County, which affirmed a decision of the City of Dayton Board of Zoning Appeals adverse to Appellant. The action was commenced by the Zoning Administrator for the City of Dayton ("City"), alleging that Gem City's inventory of regulated substances on site exceeded its established Total Maximum Daily Inventory of 2155 pounds.
{¶ 2} The relevant history of the property at issue, 2127 Old Troy Pike in Dayton, Ohio, begins in 1988 with the adoption of the City's Well Field…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Pons v. Ohio State Medical BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1993
- Dudukovich v. Lorain Metropolitan Housing AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 1979
- Pritz v. MesserOhio Supreme Court · 1925
- Community Concerned Citizens, Inc. v. Union Township Board of Zoning AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 1993
- Village of Hudson v. Albrecht, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Key Ads, Inc. v. Dayton Bd. of Zoning AppealsOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- Marietta v. Washington Cty. Woman's Home Bd. of TrusteesOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- Powlette v. Dayton Bd. of Bldg. AppealsOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- Dixon v. Caesarscreek Twp. Board of Zoning AppealsOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- Rauch v. Jefferson Twp. Bd. of Zoning AppealsOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.