Legal Opinion

Garner v. Wolfinbarger

District Court, S.D. Alabama

Decided August 16, 1972No. Civ. A. No. 6366-70PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*501OPINION AND ORDER OVERRULING DEFENDANT FIRST AMERICAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY’S CLAIM OF THE ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE

PITTMAN, Chief Judge.

This matter is now before the Court on an important and interesting question: under what circumstances may a corporation assert the attorney-client privilege against its own stockholders?

That question arises on motion of plaintiff shareholders in a class and derivative action filed by stockholders of First American Life Insurance Company (herein “FAL”). The complaint, as amended, alleges violations of SEC Rule 10b-5, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Garner v. WolfinbargerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  2. Pattie Lea, Inc. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1967
  3. Hogan v. Teledyne, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1971
  4. Garner v. WolfinbargerDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1968
  5. Fischer v. WolfinbargerDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1968

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ohio-Sealy Mattress Manufacturing Co. v. KaplanDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1980
  2. Valente v. Pepsico, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1975
  3. Panter v. Marshall Field & Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1978
  4. Quintel Corp., N v. v. Citibank, N.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 1983
  5. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Gulf & Western Industries, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API