Legal Opinion
Hogan v. Teledyne, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided May 17, 1971No. 69 C 1941PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
ROBSON, Chief Judge.
The defendants move to dismiss the second amended complaint filed in this action for failure to state a claim under the federal securities laws or any other basis for federal jurisdiction. For the reasons set forth below, this court is of the opinion the motion should be granted.
The plaintiffs O. T. Hogan and Al-more H. Teschke purportedly bring this class action on behalf of the shareholders of United Fire Insurance Company (United Fire). 1 Count I charges the defendants Teledyne, Inc. (Teledyne) and Henry E. Singleton…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Leo Vine v. Beneficial Finance Company, Inc., and Charles H. Dowd, Stuart A. Wixson, George J. Springer, C. H. Donohue and Crown Finance Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- Knute Swanson v. American Consumer Industries, Inc., United States Cold Storage Corporation and Peoria Service CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
- William Dasho, Dasho-Rogers, Inc., an Illinois Corporation, and Maurice H. Schy v. The Susquehanna Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1967
- Albert E. Kuehnert v. Texstar CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Heyman v. HeymanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973
- Weitzman v. SteinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1977
- Kirkland v. EF Hutton and Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1983
- Boggess v. HoganDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1975
- Garner v. WolfinbargerDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.