Carlisle v. Kelly Pile & Foundation Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
BARD, District Judge.
This case is before the Court on defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint.
The plaintiff, master of the motor tug “Cyrene”, instituted the present action to recover damages for injuries which he allegedly sustained as a result of falling into an uncovered hatch on a barge owned and operated by the defendant. The plaintiff is a citizen and resident of the State of New Jersey. The defendant is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of New York. The alleged injury to the plaintiff occurred while the barge was moored to a pier at Lewes, Delaware.
I…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Neirbo Co. v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Robinson v. Coos Bay Pulp Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
- Monroe Calculating Mach. Co. v. Marchant Calculating Mach. Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1942
- Kraushaar v. LeschinDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1944
- Massachusetts Bonding & Ins. Co. v. DarbyDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1945
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Frabutt v. New York, Chicago & St. Louis R. CoDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1949
- Carlisle v. Kelly Pile & Foundation Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
- Owens Generator Co. v. H. J. Heinz Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1958
- Lunn v. United Aircraft Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1960
- Carlisle v. Kelly Pile & Foundation Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1948
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.