State v. Howard
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Judge.
Defendants present ten questions for review. These questions fall into the following broad categories: (1) whether the indictment should have been quashed and the charges dismissed prior to the jury trial on the grounds that the prosecution against defendants was based upon a statute that is unconstitutional; (2) whether the court erroneously allowed the admission of certain expert testimony; (3) whether the court erroneously allowed the admission of a written statement of the deceased “patient”; (4) whether the court committed reversible error when instructing the jury; (5)…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Loving v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- In Re QuinlanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
- State v. CherrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- People v. Utica Daw's Drug Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- State v. HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
- McLean v. McLeanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- Moore v. City of CreedmoorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
- State v. ChavisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- State v. HuangCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.