Legal Opinion

State v. Howard

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 17, 1985No. 8512SC654PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge.

Defendants present ten questions for review. These questions fall into the following broad categories: (1) whether the indictment should have been quashed and the charges dismissed prior to the jury trial on the grounds that the prosecution against defendants was based upon a statute that is unconstitutional; (2) whether the court erroneously allowed the admission of certain expert testimony; (3) whether the court erroneously allowed the admission of a written statement of the deceased “patient”; (4) whether the court committed reversible error when instructing the jury; (5)…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Loving v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. In Re QuinlanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
  4. State v. CherrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  5. People v. Utica Daw's Drug Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. State v. HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  2. McLean v. McLeanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  3. Moore v. City of CreedmoorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  4. State v. ChavisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  5. State v. HuangCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API