Sacramento Paving Co. v. Anderson
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBuckles, J.
This is an appeal from an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial in a case of street-assessment work on Eighteenth Street in the city of Sacramento. Work commenced at the south line of the alley between B and C streets and running south to the north line of E Street; from the south line of E Street to the north line of G Street; from the south line of G Street to the north line of H Street and so on to L. Street, omitting the cross streets; then commencing again at the south side of M Street running south, omitting the cross streets N, O, P, and Q, to the north line of R Street. The…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Morton v. BroderickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Hewes v. ReisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- Chase v. City Treasurer of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Shipman v. ForbesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Bates v. TwistCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Adler v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- People Ex Rel. Levin v. County of Santa ClaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- People Ex Rel. Levin v. County of Santa ClaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Town of Yreka City v. WarrensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938