Legal Opinion

Krucker v. Goddard

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided November 24, 1965No. 8652PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UDALL, Justice.

Herbert F. Krucker, hereinafter called petitioner, brought an original proceeding for a writ of mandamus in this Court to compel Samuel P. Goddard, Jr., Governor of the State of Arizona, hereinafter called respondent, to transmit petitioner’s application to the State Treasurer for certification and payment. Petitioner’s application would permit the withdrawal of four-fifths of the amount contributed by petitioner to the judges’ retirement fund. The original jurisdiction for the issuance of the writ of mandamus by this Court is embodied in Art. 6, § 5, Cl. 1, as amended, of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Employment Security Commission v. Arizona Citrus GrowersArizona Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Rodriquez v. TerryArizona Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Gietz v. WebsterArizona Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Cummings v. RosenbergArizona Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Gallo v. Industrial Commission of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Blake v. SchwartzCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
  2. Headley v. HeadleyArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Fund Manager, Public Safety Personnel Retirement System v. City of Phoenix Police Department Public Safety Personnel Retirement System BoardCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
  4. Hall v. Elected Officials' Retirement PlanArizona Supreme Court · 2016
  5. DePond v. GainerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API