Cummings v. Rosenberg
Arizona Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the Second1 Judicial District, in and for the County; of Cochise. Fletcher M. Doan, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, J. —
The only question presented by this appeal is whether the statute of limitations as contained in paragraph 2938, Civil Code of 1901, bars causes of action which accrued more than ten years prior to the time that it took effect. Its provisions are: “Any person who has a right of action for recovery of any lands, tenements or hereditaments against another having peaceable and1 adverse possession thereof, cultivating, using and enjoying the same, shall institute his suit therefor within ten years next after his cause of action shall have accrued, and not afterward.” This provision…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Terry v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Wilson v. IsemingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Sohn v. WatersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- McGahey v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Turner v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 2005
- Employment Security Commission v. Arizona Citrus GrowersArizona Supreme Court · 1944
- Zuck v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
- Headley v. HeadleyArizona Supreme Court · 1966
- Work v. United Globe MinesArizona Supreme Court · 1909
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.