Legal Opinion
Chipperini v. Crandall
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided March 26, 2003No. CIV.A.3:00 CV 345(CF)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON THE DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
DRONEY, District Judge.
The plaintiff, Gretchen Chipperini, brought this action against Kelly Crandall and John W. Varone, officers of the Groton Police Department, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging deprivation of her constitutional rights arising out of her arrest. Chipperini also asserts related Connecticut state law claims of malicious prosecution, intentional infliction of emotional distress, negligence, and state constitutional claims. 1 Pending is the defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. # 31]. For the following reasons…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- McKay v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Dodge v. County of OrangeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Waller v. City of MiddletownDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2014
- Franklin v. County of DutchessDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- White v. Martel-MoylanDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.