Legal Opinion

In Re Disciplinary Action Against Merlin

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 28, 1998No. C4-96-1201PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

The director of the Lawyers Board on Professional Responsibility petitioned this court to take disciplinary action against Carol Sue Merlin for neglect of client matters, unauthorized practice of law, failure to file income taxes, and noncooperation with the director’s office. Merlin was admitted to practice law in Minnesota in 1981 and practiced almost exclusively in the area of immigration law. Merlin failed to pay her 1994-95 attorney registration fee when due on September 80, 1994, and she was suspended from the practice of law under Rule 3, Rules of the Supreme Court for…

3Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Matter of Disciplinary Act. Against WeyhrichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  2. In Re the Discipline of SerstockSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. In Re Application for Discipline of HansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  4. In Re the Disciplinary Action Against JensenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  5. In Re Disciplinary Action Against MadsenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Disciplinary Action Against AlbrechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  2. In Re Disciplinary Action Against GeigerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  3. In re Disciplinary Action Against LetourneauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  4. In re Disciplinary Action Against PiteraSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  5. In Re Disciplinary Action Against AlbrechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API